docs: capture protocol and implementation gaps
This commit is contained in:
10
notes/discrepancies.md
Normal file
10
notes/discrepancies.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# Documentation Discrepancies
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-04-28
|
||||
|
||||
1. The plan and ADRs repeatedly describe a single Go binary, while Milestone 1 also requires `apps/web/` as a separate Vite/Preact app. The current implementation treats the web app as build-time static assets served by the Go binary.
|
||||
2. Milestone 1 asks for `packages/protocol/` with a protobuf schema, but the sync ADR and protocol spec describe JSON messages over WebSocket. The protocol package currently preserves both a `.proto` placeholder and TypeScript-facing JSON model notes.
|
||||
3. ADR-005 stores content under `data/files/...`, while Milestone 2 examples use `store/...`. The implementation follows ADR-005 and uses `data/files`.
|
||||
4. ADR-007 says "No build scripts: Makefile only — no npm install," but the chosen frontend stack requires a Node package install step. The Makefile centralizes it, but the dependency policy needs clarification.
|
||||
5. The foundation milestone specifies `golang-migrate`, but `go-libsql` integration constraints need a clean validation path. A lightweight internal migrator is used now so the project can move forward.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user